Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 08:07
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Is Andrew Tate losing popularity?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
The One Habit an Oncologist Recommends Everyone Add by Age 40 - Eat This Not That
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What is the best eye serum for dark circles?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Has anyone ever had sex with their cousin? How did it start, and would you do it again?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Have you ever regretted not hitting on a older women?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Thank you.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
The Simple Rule That Seems To Govern How Life Is Organized On Earth - IFLScience
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Boeing airplane orders rise to highest level since late 2023 ahead of Paris Air Show - CNBC